Assuming the existence of a complete and final written contract,the parol evidence rule would prohibit evidence of:
A) Prior or contemporaneous oral statements that alter,contradict,or add to the terms of the contract.
B) Prior or contemporaneous oral statements that explain ambiguities in the contract.
C) Subsequent oral statements that modify the contract.
D) A and C.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q57: Which of the following constitutes a sufficient
Q58: The equitable doctrine that permits enforcement of
Q59: Which of the following contracts is required
Q60: An oral contract in which Sally agrees
Q62: What is "parol evidence?"
A) Oral evidence that
Q63: John is president and sole shareholder of
Q64: Prior to signing a written agreement for
Q67: Mandy enters a written agreement to rent
Q67: Jack and Jill were discussing business over
Q82: What is the purpose of the parol
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents