Jack and Jill were discussing business over lunch when they agreed on the sale of some goods.Because neither of them had any paper handy,Jack wrote the following on a napkin: "Jill agrees to purchase from Jack,1,000 widgets to be delivered on July 1,2001,at a cost of $10,000,payable on delivery." Jill signed the napkin,although Jack did not sign it.Jack delivered the widgets per the contract,but Jill refuses to pay for them.If Jack sues Jill for the price of the goods,the most likely result is:
A) Jill will win because this writing is not sufficient under the Statute of Frauds.
B) Jack will win because the writing is sufficient under the Statute of Frauds.
C) Jill will win because Jack did not sign the contract.
D) Jack will win because the Statute of Frauds does not apply to this situation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q62: Assuming the existence of a complete and
Q63: John is president and sole shareholder of
Q64: Prior to signing a written agreement for
Q67: Mandy enters a written agreement to rent
Q68: Seller and Buyer negotiate for the sale
Q69: A contract for the purchase of a
Q70: Under the parol evidence rule,which of the
Q72: In December,2001,Mark signs a written consulting agreement
Q82: What is the purpose of the parol
Q85: How should an e-mail message be evaluated
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents