In the McKennon v.Nashville Banner Publishing Co.case,after-acquired evidence of the plaintiff-employee's misconduct was introduced in a lawsuit filed under the ADEA.How did the U.S.Supreme Court rule?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that after-acquired evidence of the plaintiff-employee's misconduct can limit the remedies available to the plaintiff in an ADEA lawsuit, and that remedies should be limited to back pay and should not include reinstatement or front pay. However, the court also held that the employer's discriminatory conduct that occurred prior to the discovery of the after-acquired evidence can still be considered in determining liability and the amount of damages awarded.

In the McKennon V