In the International Union United Automobile,Aerospace & Agriculture Implement Workers of America,UAW v.Johnson Controls,Inc.case,employer Johnson Controls had a "fetal protection policy" that essentially barred women from working in unsafe working environments unless the employee could medically document her inability to bear children.How did the U.S.Supreme Court rule?
A) The policy was a facially discriminatory policy forbidden under Title VII because it did not also apply to the reproductive capacity of male employees.
B) The policy was a facially discriminatory policy forbidden under Title VII unless the employer had documented proof that the exposure would likely harm a developing fetus.
C) The policy was allowable under Title VII unless the female employee had documented proof that the exposure would not likely harm a developing fetus.
D) The policy was allowable under Title VII so long as the employer had a good faith belief that the exposure would harm a developing fetus.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q17: In the Harris v.Forklift Systems,Inc.case,the U.S.Supreme Court
Q18: Federal legislation to amend Title VII to
Q19: Title VII has been successfully used to
Q20: Discrimination on the basis of pregnancy is
Q21: A reasonable accommodation for a disabled employee
Q23: Title VII prohibits discrimination based on:
A) race,color,and
Q24: CASE 13.2,EEOC v.Abercrombie & Fitch Stores,Inc.(2015)involved a
Q25: Which of the following is generally true
Q26: In the Holcomb v.Iona College case,a white
Q27: An employee may use the Family and
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents