In a case in which the employee claimed harassment by her supervisor in which he altered her work hours with the knowledge that doing so would adversely affect her hypoglycemia; frequently stood at her desk and stared angrily at her; startled her by pounding on her desk with his fist; criticized her work unfairly; and yelled at her in front of co-workers, the court ruled that:
A) no sexual harassment was proven, because no demand for sexual favors was made
B) no sexual harassment was proven, because no hostile environment was created
C) a hostile environment was created by the supervisor's conduct
D) no harassment could be proven without verbal or physical conduct of a sexual nature
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Which of the following is a necessary
Q6: If an employee is subject to severe
Q7: The plaintiff in a harassment case must
Q8: In the case of "equal opportunity harassers"
Q9: Which of the following is part of
Q11: Same-sex harassment is actionable only if it
Q12: The primary difference between harassment that results
Q13: Which of the following is true of
Q14: Regarding the "severe" or "pervasive" standard for
Q15: Regarding harassment, which of the following statements
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents