In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service Comm., the New York utility commission ruled that electric utilities could not advertise to promote the use of electricity. The Supreme Court held that the:
A) the State interest in conserving energy was substantial, but a complete suppression of speech was more extensive than necessary to further the energy conservation goals
B) the State interest in conserving energy was not substantial and a complete suppression of speech was more extensive than necessary to further the energy conservation goals
C) the State interest in conserving energy was substantial and a complete suppression of speech was necessary to further the energy conservation goals
D) the State interest in saving money was substantial, but a complete suppression of speech was more extensive than necessary to further the energy conservation goals
E) none of the other choices are correct
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q305: In Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union, concerning
Q306: In Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.
Q307: In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.
Q308: In Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.
Q309: Restrictions on advertising for professional services are:
A)
Q311: In Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union, concerning
Q312: In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.
Q313: In Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v.
Q314: In Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp.
Q315: In the case Board of Trustees of
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents