In Bose Corp

In Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union, concerning a magazine article critical of Bose speakers, the Supreme Court held that:

A) Consumers Union was prohibited by the First Amendment from criticizing a legal products
B) there was "actual malice" in the article published in Consumer Reports that criticized a Bose product, hence there was no First Amendment protection of the speech
C) since the criticism was shown to be true, Bose had to pay Consumers Union damages
D) the First Amendment allows criticism of business in general, but the names of specific companies may not be mentioned
E) none of the other choices