In Guz V Bechtel National the Supreme Court of California Held That

In Guz v. Bechtel National the supreme court of California held that Guz, an employee who had been fired and sued for wrongful dismissal had:

A) no cause of action because his performance had been poor
B) no cause of action for breach of implied contract; his best hope was a violation of personnel policies that constituted a contract
C) no cause of action for violation of personnel policies, because the company followed proper procedure, but may have a cause of action for breach of implied contract
D) a cause of action for breach of an implied covenant of fair dealing
E) a cause of action for breach of California's employment code