In the Goebel et al v.Frank Clothiers exercise,the company could have avoided adverse impact by interpreting the test scores according to ethnic classification of the test taker.Which of the following is correct regarding this approach?

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

Assigning different scores to individuals based on their race or ethnicity, also known as "race norming," is illegal under the Civil Rights Act of 1991. This practice can lead to reverse discrimination and is not consistent with sound HRM practices or High Performance Work Practices. The company should have focused on developing better selection methods that do not have an adverse impact on protected groups.

In the Goebel Et Al V