Werhane and Radin in "Employment at Will and Due Process

Werhane and Radin in "Employment at Will and Due Process" provide a primarily Kantian critique of EAW while Epstein in "In Defense of the Contract at Will" provides a primarily utilitarian defense of EAW. First, provide the strongest defense of Werhane and Radin's position. Second, provide the strongest defense of Epstein's position. Finally, stake your own position. Which side do you agree with most strongly. Why