Sean was employed by HGB Inc.as a manager.He was fired for sexually harassing his secretary.A prospective employer called HGB for a reference and was told that Sean was terminated on charges of sexual harassment.Which of the following statements is most likely to be true in this case?
A) Sean has a cause for action against HGB for defamation.
B) HGB is not liable for defamation because the statement was true and made in good faith.
C) Sean has a cause for action for invasion of privacy.
D) HGB is liable for public disclosure of private facts because it is illegal to make defamatory statements about an ex-employee.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q18: Tanya openly talks to her co-workers about
Q19: Ling was fired by MTM Mart because
Q20: It is unlawful under the Electronic Communications
Q21: Though a worker might be protected based
Q22: To state a prima facie case for
Q23: _ refers to defamation in a written
Q24: Josh left an employee's private medical files
Q26: Who among the following has committed the
Q28: John was upset with Brad,his supervisor,for giving
Q31: An employer has a legitimate interest in
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents