Thomas hires an alien worker named Desai to work for his firm.Before being employed,Desai is required to produce the statutorily required documents demonstrating his right to work in the United States.However,because of Desai's qualifications and the cost benefits Thomas's company will incur if he is hired,Thomas decides to employ Desai without asking him to provide the necessary documents.Which of the following holds true in this case?
A) Thomas cannot be held liable for unlawful employment practice because he can establish an affirmative defense by showing that Desai's documents were not verified for a legitimate reason.
B) Thomas cannot be held liable as it is an unfair immigration-related practice for a person or other entity to verify if an individual is an authorized alien or an illegal immigrant.
C) Thomas can be held liable under the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 for employing an individual without verifying his or her employment eligibility.
D) Thomas can be held liable under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 only if Desai has any criminal lawsuits filed against him.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q5: Under Title VII of the Civil Rights
Q6: The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA)prohibits
Q7: Himiona,who belongs to the Maori tribe,aspires to
Q7: In the case of Garcia v.Spun Steak
Q8: Henri,who runs a French restaurant,wants his diners
Q9: Smith,the manager of a manufacturing unit,issues a
Q11: If an employee is consistently subject to
Q12: Chuntao,an employee of Chinese origin,works as a
Q14: Under the Immigration Reform and Control Act's
Q15: The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC)created a
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents