Albert is an assistant store manager for a national discount retailer.When Albert was denied a promotion to store manager he filed a claim based on religious discrimination with the EEOC,which was eventually denied.After the claim,Albert was transferred to be the assistant store manager at a location requiring a 97-mile round trip commute that takes about four hours of travel time per day.His previous worksite had been only 15 minutes from his home.
A) Since Albert retained his position in the company as an assistant store manager and he kept the same pay level, this is not retaliation.
B) This action is ex post facto evidence of retaliation.
C) The employer is not vulnerable to a charge of retaliation because Albert's charge of discrimination was denied.
D) This action could be considered retaliation.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q2: In a legal determination of whether discrimination
Q3: Which of the following would be defined
Q4: Henry,an upper-level manager at a software design
Q5: The most fundamental anti-discrimination employment law,the one
Q6: Ingrid is a recent immigrant from Denmark
Q8: The landmark case that established the importance
Q9: Borderline Cafeterias,Inc.,has discovered that most of its
Q10: In Washington v.Davis
A) since the reading comprehension
Q11: Individuals who fall within a group identified
Q12: A practice necessary for safe and efficient
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents