Solved

In the Chevron USA,Inc

Question 34

Multiple Choice
In the Chevron USA,Inc.v.Echazabal case discussed in the text,the plaintiff claimed Chevron violated his rights under the ADA when it refused to allow him to work in its refinery because of plaintiff's liver disease and concerns regarding his health.How did the U.S.Supreme Court rule?

In the Chevron USA,Inc.v.Echazabal case discussed in the text,the plaintiff claimed Chevron violated his rights under the ADA when it refused to allow him to work in its refinery because of plaintiff's liver disease and concerns regarding his health.How did the U.S.Supreme Court rule?


A) The Court ruled that under the ADA an employer is authorized to refuse to hire an individual if the individual's performance on the job would endanger his or her own health owing to a disability.
B) The Court ruled that under the ADA an employer is only authorized to refuse to hire an individual if the individual's performance on the job would in any manner endanger another employee's health.
C) The Court ruled that under the ADA an employer is only authorized to refuse to hire an individual if he or she has a communicable disease.
D) The Court ruled that under the ADA an employer may not take into consideration a health condition that would present a problem to the applicant or others.The employer may only consider whether the applicant has the skills to do the job.

Correct Answer:

verifed

Verified

Unlock this answer now
Get Access to more Verified Answers free of charge

Related Questions

Unlock this Answer For Free Now!

View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions

qr-code

Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks

upload documents

Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents