When employers have been sued for monitoring the content of their employees' e-mails at work, the court have generally held that the monitoring:
A) is an invasion of privacy
B) is an invasion of privacy if personal e-mails are reviewed, not work-related e-mails
C) is sexual harassment if directed at women employees
D) is legal, employers have the right to do so, in part to prevent sexual harassment
E) none of the other choices
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q247: In Harris v. Forklift Systems, a woman
Q248: In Harris v. Forklift Systems, a woman
Q249: Quid pro quo sexual harassment occurs when:
A)
Q250: In Harris v. Forklift Systems, a woman
Q251: Sexual harassment does not appear to include:
A)
Q253: Where there is a promise of a
Q254: A sexually hostile work environment is:
A) a
Q255: Many employers monitor the e-mail their employees
Q256: To determine if there is a hostile
Q257: Sexual harassment legally does not include:
A) "unwelcome"
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents