Brito v .Zia Company,the court ruled that the company
A) had proven that age was appropriate to consider in the evaluation of pilots.
B) had not shown that its performance evaluation instrument was valid in the sense that it related to important elements in the jobs for which the employees were being evaluated.
C) evaluation systems must be equally applied across genders.
D) had not shown the need to use gender specific evaluation methods.

Question

Quizplus · Accepted Answer

The court ruled that Zia Company had not shown that its performance evaluation instrument was valid in the sense that it related to important elements in the jobs for which the employees were being evaluated. This indicates that the company failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the validity of its evaluation system. Therefore, option B is the best choice.

Brito V Zia Company,the Court Ruled That the Company