LaTonya joins the Freewill Church,and as a member,she is not allowed to wear pants.Her employer,Salo's Seafood,requires all employees to wear coveralls provided by the company for safety reasons.Although LaTonya wore the uniform prior to joining the church,she now refuses to wear the coverall.She explains to Sal,the owner of the restaurant,that wearing pants is against her beliefs.Sal makes an exception in her case and allows her to wear knee-length boots with a protective jacket,but LaTonya refuses to wear the boots.Sal fires her for insubordination.Which of the following holds true in this case?
A) Sal is liable for religious discrimination for failing to provide an accommodation that LaTonya would accept.
B) Sal is liable for religious discrimination for failing to provide a reasonable alternative.
C) Sal is not liable for religious discrimination because LaTonya's religious practice is not followed by any other employee at the company.
D) Sal is not liable for religious discrimination because he made an effort to reasonably accommodate LaTonya's religious practice.
Correct Answer:
Verified
Q8: _ is defined as the burden imposed
Q9: Cara has been a customer service associate
Q10: Under Title VII (of The Civil Rights
Q11: A religious organization will generally be exempt
Q13: An employer does not have to accommodate
Q14: The duty to reasonably accommodate an employee's
Q15: When establishing a prima facie case to
Q16: Patrick was employed by a church as
Q17: Under the guidelines established by President Clinton
Q27: Shayna,a Jewish woman,applied for a baker's job
Unlock this Answer For Free Now!
View this answer and more for free by performing one of the following actions
Scan the QR code to install the App and get 2 free unlocks
Unlock quizzes for free by uploading documents